Cullen

The Consultation Letters of Dr William Cullen (1710-1790) at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

 

[ID:2062] From: Dr John Gilchrist (of Speddoch) / To: Dr William Cullen (Professor Cullen) / Regarding: Mr Hugh Lawson (of Girthead) (Patient) / 12 September 1781 / (Incoming)

Letter from John Gilchrist, following his return from Edinburgh. He describes the final stages of Mr [Hugh] Lawson's illness and his death, and also gives a report on the post-mortem, which uncovered 2 kidney stones, one of which was extremely large and could not have been passed, causing suppuration in the kidney. Handstamp very faint and therefore illegible.

Facsimile

There are 4 images for this document.

[Page 1]


 

[Page 2]


 

[Page 3]


 

[Page 4]


 
 

Metadata

FieldData
DOC ID 2062
RCPE Catalogue Number CUL/1/2/1136
Main Language English
Document Direction Incoming
Date12 September 1781
Annotation None
TypeAuthorial original
Enclosure(s) No enclosure(s)
Autopsy Yes
Recipe No
Regimen No
Letter of Introduction No
Case Note No
Summary Letter from John Gilchrist, following his return from Edinburgh. He describes the final stages of Mr [Hugh] Lawson's illness and his death, and also gives a report on the post-mortem, which uncovered 2 kidney stones, one of which was extremely large and could not have been passed, causing suppuration in the kidney. Handstamp very faint and therefore illegible.
Manuscript Incomplete? No
Evidence of Commercial Posting Yes

Case

Cases that this document belongs to:

Case ID Description Num Docs
[Case ID:517]
Case of Mr Hugh Lawson who has developed pains in his joints, possibly gout or nephritic. His condition baffles local physician Dr John Gilchrist to whom he is related, but eventually proves to be a fatal case of kidney stone.
6


People linked to this document

Person IDRole in documentPerson
[PERS ID:115]AuthorDr John Gilchrist (of Speddoch)
[PERS ID:1]AddresseeDr William Cullen (Professor Cullen)
[PERS ID:116]PatientMr Hugh Lawson (of Girthead)
[PERS ID:1]Patient's Physician / Surgeon / ApothecaryDr William Cullen (Professor Cullen)
[PERS ID:115]Patient's Physician / Surgeon / ApothecaryDr John Gilchrist (of Speddoch)
[PERS ID:115]Patient's Relative / Spouse / FriendDr John Gilchrist (of Speddoch)

Places linked to this document

Role in document Specific Place Settlements / Areas Region Country Global Region Confidence
Place of Writing Dumfries Borders Scotland Europe certain
Destination of Letter Cullen's House / Mint Close Edinburgh Edinburgh and East Scotland Europe certain
Mentioned / Other Edinburgh Edinburgh and East Scotland Europe certain

Normalized Text

[Page 1]
Dumfries September 12. 1781
Dear Sir


From having been rather more than usually
occupied for eight or ten days past I have been prevent¬
ed from letting you know the event of Mr Lawsons
case, which I mean't sooner to inform you of. Soon
after I came home from Edinburgh his feverishness again
became very considerable, and was attended, every
two or three days, with one circumstance or another
strongly marking the danger that was to be apprehended.
Two different times I was alarmed, for a day or more,
with the appearance of a bad sore throat, with many aph¬
thous sloughs
, which however soon yielded to gargling,
or rather syringing. –– Frequently he had attacks of
coughing and breathlessness. –– Considering all things
when his pulse became weak and irregular, which it
did in a remarkable manner, about three weeks ago,
I did not hesitate to declare that he was certainly dy¬
ing, which was rendered the more probable when he be¬
gan to grow slightly delirious
, as he did in a day or
two after. –––– Nothwithstanding all this however he again



[Page 2]

mended in such a manner as gave his family hopes
of his recovery, his pulse becoming firmer and regular,
his head clear, and even his appetite good. –– This
amendment however lasted but a few days; the cir¬
cumstances above mentioned, – or others of a similar
nature, soon returned, and after much struggling, he
died the end of last week. –– It would be quite need¬
less to trouble you with any account of my mea¬
sures in this situation, which were as well adapted
as I could make them to the symptoms of the
day. – On account of their varying so much from day
to day, I was prevented, more than once, from writing
you when I intended doing it, - seeing that it could be
of no use. -- I hope you will believe that, in all cases,
I have never omitted writing, when there was the
least propriety in it.


For two or three days before Mr Lawson died he com¬
plained of ↑very↑ acute pain in the small of his back, on the right
side
; that is, in the region of the Kidney; and, during that time,



[Page 3]

there was an almost entire suppression of urine. ––
On examining his body the right kidney was quite
sound, and contained nothing. – The left kidney was
somewhat larger than usual; a good part of it,
when viewed externally, was livid, as if from the effect
of inflammation
; and its pelvis contained two stones;
one of which perhaps might have passed the ureter,
for he voided one nearly as large last year (tho it
stuck some hours in the Urethra;) –– the other, being
at least four times larger
, it is probable would never
have left the Kidney; – and, from its fixed [seat and?]
irritation, I suppose, a small suppuration was [beg[un]?]
from which, when the knife reached ↑it,↑ a good tea-¬
spoonful of pus flowed
. –– The thick and very dark-¬
coloured urine which I formerly mentioned, continued
more or less to the last. –– In the Bladder there
were no stones found, – as indeed there was no rea¬
son to expect them; – and it contained but very little
Urine.

I am always Dear Sir Your faithful and obedient Servant
John Gilchrist.



[Page 4]


To
Doctor Cullen
Physician
Edinburgh


Dr Gilchrist
Concerning Mr Lawson
September 1781
XIII. p. 68

Diplomatic Text

[Page 1]
Dumfries Sept. 12. 1781
Dear Sir


From having been rather more than usually
occupied for eight or ten days past I have been prevent¬
ed from letting you know the event of Mr Lawsons
case, which I mean't sooner to inform you of. Soon
after I came home from Edinr. his feverishness again
became very considerable, and was attended, every
two or three days, with one circumstance or another
strongly marking the danger that was to be apprehended.
Two different times I was alarmed, for a day or more,
with the appearance of a bad sore throat, with many aph¬
thous sloughs
, which however soon yielded to gargling,
or rather syringing. –– Frequently he had attacks of
coughing and breathlessness. –– Considering all things
when his pulse became weak and irregular, which it
did in a remarkable manner, about three weeks ago,
I did not hesitate to declare that he was certainly dy¬
ing, which was rendered the more probable when he be¬
gan to grow slightly delirious
, as he did in a day or
two after. –––– Nothwithstanding all this however he again



[Page 2]

mended in such a manner as gave his family hopes
of his recovery, his pulse becoming firmer and regular,
his head clear, and even his appetite good. –– This
amendment however lasted but a few days; the cir¬
cumstances above mentioned, – or others of a similar
nature, soon returned, and after much struggling, he
died the end of last week. –– It would be quite need¬
less to trouble you with any account of my mea¬
sures in this situation, which were as well adapted
as I could make them to the symptoms of the
day. – On account of their varying so much from day
to day, I was prevented, more than once, from writing
you when I intended doing it, - seeing that it could be
of no use. -- I hope you will believe that, in all cases,
I have never omitted writing, when there was the
least propriety in it.


For two or three days before Mr Lawson died he com¬
plained of ↑very↑ acute pain in the small of his back, on the right
side
; that is, in the region of the Kidney; and, during that time,



[Page 3]

there was an almost entire suppression of urine. ––
On examining his body the right kidney was quite
sound, and contained nothing. – The left kidney was
somewhat larger than usual; a good part of it,
when viewed externally, was livid, as if from the effect
of inflammation
; and its pelvis contained two stones;
one of which perhaps might have passed the ureter,
for he voided one nearly as large last year (tho it
stuck some hours in the Urethra;) –– the other, being
at least four times larger
, it is probable would never
have left the Kidney; – and, from its fixed [seat and?]
irritation, I suppose, a small suppuration was [beg[un]?]
from which, when the knife reached ↑it,↑ a good tea-¬
spoonful of pus flowed
. –– The thick and very dark-¬
coloured urine which I formerly mentioned, continued
more or less to the last. –– In the Bladder there
were no stones found, – as indeed there was no rea¬
son to expect them; – and it contained but very little
Urine.

I am always Dear Sir Your faithful and obed. Servt
John Gilchrist.



[Page 4]


To
Doctor Cullen
Physician
Edinburgh


Dr Gilchrist
C Mr Lawson
Septr 1781
XIII. p. 68

XML

XML file not yet available.

Feedback

Send us specfic feeback about this document [DOC ID:2062]

Type
Comments
 

Please note that the Cullen Project team have now disbanded but your comments will be logged in our system and we will look at them one day...