Cullen

The Consultation Letters of Dr William Cullen (1710-1790) at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

 

[ID:1028] From: Dr William Cullen (Professor Cullen) / To: Dr John Clark (Clerke, Clarke) / Regarding: Mrs Clark (Clerke, Clarke) (Patient) / 3 October 1780 / (Outgoing)

Reply 'To Dr Clarke in Newcastle [Concerning] his Wife'

Facsimile

There is 1 image for this document.

[Page 1]


 
 

Metadata

FieldData
DOC ID 1028
RCPE Catalogue Number CUL/1/1/13/83
Main Language English
Document Direction Outgoing
Date3 October 1780
Annotation None
TypeScribal copy ( includes Casebook Entry)
Enclosure(s) No enclosure(s)
Autopsy No
Recipe No
Regimen No
Letter of Introduction No
Case Note No
Summary Reply 'To Dr Clarke in Newcastle [Concerning] his Wife'
Manuscript Incomplete? No
Evidence of Commercial Posting No

Case

Cases that this document belongs to:

Case ID Description Num Docs
[Case ID:1278]
Case of Mrs Clark(e) [Clerke], wife of Dr Clark(e) at Newcastle, who has a pectoral complaint.
4


People linked to this document

Person IDRole in documentPerson
[PERS ID:1]AuthorDr William Cullen (Professor Cullen)
[PERS ID:816]AddresseeDr John Clark (Clerke, Clarke)
[PERS ID:840]PatientMrs Clark (Clerke, Clarke)
[PERS ID:1]Patient's Physician / Surgeon / ApothecaryDr William Cullen (Professor Cullen)
[PERS ID:816]Patient's Physician / Surgeon / ApothecaryDr John Clark (Clerke, Clarke)
[PERS ID:816]Patient's Relative / Spouse / FriendDr John Clark (Clerke, Clarke)

Places linked to this document

Role in document Specific Place Settlements / Areas Region Country Global Region Confidence
Place of Writing Cullen's House / Mint Close Edinburgh Edinburgh and East Scotland Europe certain
Destination of Letter Newcastle upon Tyne North-East England Europe certain

Normalized Text

[Page 1]
To Dr Clarke in Newcastle Concerning his Wife ---


Though no purulence yet appears in her Spitting
I must suspect a Suppuration within and the event of this is
too commonly unfavourable but not so certainly as to excuse our
omitting any means of relief that may be suggested I wish
I could recommend some with much Confidence. The Seneka root has
appeared to be of service given to such quantity as the Stomach
and Intestines easily bear - unless it is given in small and divided
Doses it will excite Vomiting, which it seems your Wife is not
suited to bear and it will readily purge which I think in her case
cannot be pushed far, but you may make some cautious trials.
Though Mrs Clarke does not bear full Vomiting I must observe
that I have almost always found benefit from nauseating doses of
an Antinomial. Every thing that determines to the skin relieves the
Lungs. Though I am persuaded that Opiates are unfavourable to
every Inflammatory state I think there has been so much of a Spasmodic
affection in your Wifes Case that you could not avoid Opiates & in most
cases of Cough I have thought they did more service by avoiding the irritation
from Coughing than harm by their Inflammatory tendency and I am clear
that you must continue them in the present case as the chief means of
relief to be depended on. If by repetition they seem to fail, I suspect it
is owing to you not having courage in increasing the dose - I think the
Riding on horseback has been very properly employed, & should be
continued as long as the Weather will allow, but I do not think it is
to be pushed in all weathers. I think you might also in Blistering
& an Issue often it may be of Service. I could wish the abstinence
from meat & wine had been continued, but I leave that to your discretion
Demulcents are frequently of service & you must have already determined
by experience what kind are of use to Mrs. Clarke, but I must
observe that to a Person who takes Opiates, the Trochsci bechici
nigri cum opio
of our Dispensary 1 is one of the most effectual demulcents

October 3d. 1780

Notes:

1: See Pharmacopoeia Collegii Regii Medicorum Edinburgensis (Edinburgh: 1774), pp.169-70.

Diplomatic Text

[Page 1]
To Dr Clarke in Newcastle Concg. his Wife ---


Though no purulence yet appears in her Spitting
I must suspect a Suppuration within and the event of this is
too commonly unfavourable but not so certainly as to excuse our
omitting any means of relief that may be suggested I wish
I could recommend some with much Confidence. The Seneka root has
appeared to be of service given to such quantity as the Stomach
and Intestines easily bear - unless it is given in small and divided
Doses it will excite Vomiting, which it seems your Wife is not
suited to bear and it will readily purge which I think in her case
cannot be pushed far, but you may make some cautious trials.
Though Mrs Clarke does not bear full Vomiting I must observe
that I have almost always found benefit from nauseating doses of
an Antinomial. Every thing that determines to the skin relieves the
Lungs. Though I am persuaded that Opiates are unfavourable to
every Inflammatory state I think there has been so much of a Spasmc.
affection in your Wifes Case that you could not avoid Opiates & in most
cases of Cough I have thought they did more service by avoiding the irritation
from Coughing than harm by their Inflammatory tendency and I am clear
that you must continue them in the present case as the chief means of
relief to be depended on. If by repetition they seem to fail, I suspect it
is owing to you not having courage in increasing the dose - I think the
Riding on horseback has been very properly employed, & should be
continued as long as the Weather will allow, but I do not think it is
to be pushed in all weathers. I think you might also in Blistering
& an Issue often it may be of Service. I could wish the abstinence
from meat & wine had been continued, but I leave that to your discretion
Demulcents are frequently of service & you must have already determd.
by experience what kind are of use to Mrs. Clarke, but I must
observe that to a Person who takes Opiates, the Trochsci bechici
nigri cum opio
of our Dispensary 1 is one of the most effectual demulcs.

Octr. 3d. 1780

Notes:

1: See Pharmacopoeia Collegii Regii Medicorum Edinburgensis (Edinburgh: 1774), pp.169-70.

XML

XML file not yet available.

Feedback

Send us specfic feeback about this document [DOC ID:1028]

Type
Comments
 

Please note that the Cullen Project team have now disbanded but your comments will be logged in our system and we will look at them one day...